Pree is a mysterious warlock from Qarth that attempts to win Daenerys to his cause - Business - Business Ideas

<p>In a nice bit of alliterative casting news, both Podrick Payne and Pyat Pree have been cast in season two of Game of Thrones. Access Hollywood got the Pod scoop, young actor Daniel Portman has been cast to play Podrick Payne.Access Hollywood can exclusively reveal that actor Daniel Portman has been cast as Tyrion's squire, Podrick Payne.Podrick is actually in the first book in author George R. R. Martin's "A Song of Ice and Fire" series, but was not shown in Season 1 of the HBO series.He becomes an invaluable ally to Tyrion as the imp becomes the King's Hand in Season 2.Portman appeared in the 2010 horror film "Outcast," alongside "Dr. Who" star Karen Gillan. He also has a small role in the upcoming 2012-due film, "The Angel's Share."Westeros.org has the second piece of casting news, they report that British actor Ian Hanmore will be playing the role of Pyat Pree. No Lord Hoster? Sure, you can have his dying be off-camera if you want, but there are mysteries remaining, eve
n today, in his deathbed "Tansy" ramblings that still aren't 100% clear. (They're probably 90% clear.) These are important because they have a great deal to do with Lysa and her motivations. Are there other ways to tell it? Sure. Petyr Baelish can steal Hoster's lines like he stole the Hound's. That dude's a crook! But without Hoster, you also miss some potentially good scenes with Michelle Fairley. And she has little enough to do this season as it is.3. No Blackfish? Yeah, we've been over it. No Blackfish = no conflict with Lord Hoster while he's still kickin'. It's all "after the fact" conflict. Do we need it? Probably not, in the grand scheme of things. Do we want it? Sure! And he's freaking vital in A Feast for Crows, necessary to Jaime's story. Or you replace him with someone else at the siege (Edmure has been suggested). I don't think they want to stunt Jaime though.The Trout may be out of season two, it's certainly possible, and the story is certainly workable without
it. But if we don't see Riverrun by season three, the story's going to smell a little fishy to me.Season one saw a few Tullycentric scenes that had, in the books, taken place inside Riverrun. Yet the television series moved them elsewhere; Robb was crowned King in the North at some nameless holdfast, and Jaime was questioned by Catelyn (a Clash of Kings encounter on top of that) outside whilst tied to a prisoner pole. So even though we were supposed to have glimpsed Riverrun by the end of season one, that didn't happen.So what of season two? Traditionally, Catelyn begins ACoK at Riverrun, and from there goes to seek out a certain Baratheon. I suspect she will not go to Riverrun at all, and will simply begin season two en route. That probably introduces us to Brienne and Margaery, et/al, very early in the season. Which is fine. HoweverCatelyn doesn't return to Riverrun until the last quarter of ACoK, which could be where they intend to finally introduce the fortress to us if
they want to. But what if they don't? What if the Trout is indeed out? What is lost here?1. No Edmure? This is the biggest loss overall, since him and his hangdog persona are largely responsible for more than a few Tully gaffes. But if we take a closer look he's only really important down the line in future books. You could easily lose Edmure from season two and not lose much of anything at all. But if they cut him altogether, then we could have problems. Without Edmure we don't get his pitiful yet darkly comical attempts to hit a barge with an arrow. We don't get a certain wedding (it would have to be someone else's wedding). And we don't get multiple lynching attempts by a certain family.</p>

<br><br><br><br><a href="http://iautoblog.com">iAutoblog</a> the premier <a href="http://iautoblog.com">autoblogger</a> software

Related Posts by Categories